Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 195

Thread: New BIBBA website

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gavin View Post
    And as I've alluded to, there are people locally willing to sidestep soapboxes and spend their own valuable time trying to improve things in a collaborative way and with their eyes open about the difficulties.

    A much better way to proceed than to turn to the importer of queens or packages for a temporary fix which ends up making things worse for everyone (unstable genetics locally, poorly adapted bees, new pests and diseases and new variants of pests and diseases coming in .... )
    Sorry Gavin if that upsets you but a hybrid is a hybrid and anywhere that migratory beekeeping occurs the bees will be hybidised
    Trying to breed back to something like AMM has no more validity than any other process of selection from the hybrid bees
    There is no reason why choosing ones with fluffy bums and nice wings should be exclusively considered desirable

    I don't get on soap boxes, in fact I largely just keep myself to myself, not joining lots of organisations and pressure groups
    Some other beekeepers are members of everything under the sun, on committees ,preaching their message etc -- good luck to them
    I always welcome the Jehova's witnesses at the door because they are very nice people,well dressed,well meaning and committed
    That doesn't mean I accept any of their views or I would ever consider becoming one
    To me working against nature, which puts every effort into increasing the hybridisation of the honeybee, is in fact a waste of time and effort
    On imports you had best address those points to the importers but they have nothing to do with the breeding of AMM from the background population of bees
    To maintain an AMM or any other pure bred population you would need the 4 conditions I listed in post #95

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Drone Ranger View Post
    To me working against nature, which puts every effort into increasing the hybridisation of the honeybee,
    I think nature plays a longer game than this. It might put every effort into hybridisation but in the long term the undesirable traits resulting from this hybridisation will be lost anyway if the hybrid bees are not adapted to local climate etc etc. Maybe the attempt to breed locally adapted Amm, with other desirable traits, actually helps nature by bypassing this long winded evolutionary process that would see many of the "poor adaptation to local climate traits" lost anyway. Of course it means you miss out on all the desirable traits as well which is what nature "wanted".....I guess it works both ways ! Interesting topic guys

  3. #3
    Senior Member Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Belfast, N. Ireland
    Posts
    5,122
    Blog Entries
    94

    Default

    DR. I am sure your 4 conditions could be met in various parts of Scotland.
    Clearly it is like pushing a boulder uphill if someone plants hundreds of Carnica colonies near you one year followed by hundreds of Ligustica the next.
    The advantage we have in Ireland is that in the North there are no commercial beekeepers and in the south the commercial and semi commercial beekeepers mostly use native stock.

    Starting with hybrids or mongrels could certainly lead to a better bee. Brother Adam demonstrated that you can tinker and improve.
    The thing is though, it has to be done in a controlled fashion and what you have with the commercial beekeepers in Scotland is total chaos with regard to stirring up the gene pool. It will never stablise to produce a population which breeds more or less true for the traits you want if there is a random injection of new genetics every year.

  4. #4

    Default

    If the 4 conditions were met you would be home and dry you don't need to worry about Commercial beekeepers or anybody else

    greengumbo's post started me thinking
    Surely we are not trying to assert that some bees that were around in Viking times were better that the bees we have now after hundreds of years of selecting from the best.
    When was the golden age of AMM that we are trying to return to ?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Wales, Gorllewin Cymru
    Posts
    709

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Drone Ranger View Post
    When was the golden age of AMM that we are trying to return to ?
    That should read "When is the golden age of our indigenous bees going to happen ?"
    This is whats so exciting about the new energy and vigour surrounding native bee breeding projects, unlike ligustica and carnica bees, which have had considerable resources spent improving them for quite some time, the potential for improving AMM is still ripe for development, who knows where this will lead us.

  6. #6

    Default

    Steve thanks for taking the time to give a detailed explanation of the BIBBA position

    I would have posted sooner but after reading mbc's post I was struck by a flying pig and rendered insensible

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    639

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Drone Ranger View Post
    I would have posted sooner but after reading mbc's post I was struck by a flying pig and rendered insensible
    DR, If you were able to sense the renewed enthusiasm in some districts for improving their local near-natives you would not be so surprised by mbc's comment. mbc lives in an area where many of the native bees were never compromised in the first place and they are into improvement in a big way. Here we are still sorting out the genetics of the background population but the enthusiasm of the locals is palpable.

    Steve

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Wales, Gorllewin Cymru
    Posts
    709

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Drone Ranger View Post
    Steve thanks for taking the time to give a detailed explanation of the BIBBA position

    I would have posted sooner but after reading mbc's post I was struck by a flying pig and rendered insensible
    Lol.
    What I was trying to get at, which I'm sure you realise DR, is that as with any stock improvement breeding efforts, there is a time when incremental improvements plateau out, and that this plateau is unlikely to have been reached in AMM due to the historical and present lack of resources behind the breeding efforts. One man bands and enthusiastic amateur groups just dont have the same impact as the national institutions which have led ligustica and carnica breeding efforts on the continent.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Drone Ranger View Post
    Surely we are not trying to assert that some bees that were around in Viking times were better that the bees we have now after hundreds of years of selecting from the best.
    DR - are you seriously trying to say we've had hundreds of years selecting from the best of our bees?! Surely not! Selective breeding seems to be the preserve of the very, very few. Has it ever been any different?!

    Most people "breed" their bees using swarm cells from whichever colony happens to be producing them at the time and that I'm afraid ain't selective breeding. I would suggest that our bees are in fact worse than in those days as currently we have bees imported yearly which constantly degrade any natural adaptations to the local environment which might be taking place. At least homegrown bees in those days didn't have that to contend with.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drumgerry View Post
    DR - are you seriously trying to say we've had hundreds of years selecting from the best of our bees?! Surely not! Selective breeding seems to be the preserve of the very, very few. Has it ever been any different?!

    Most people "breed" their bees using swarm cells from whichever colony happens to be producing them at the time and that I'm afraid ain't selective breeding. I would suggest that our bees are in fact worse than in those days as currently we have bees imported yearly which constantly degrade any natural adaptations to the local environment which might be taking place. At least homegrown bees in those days didn't have that to contend with.
    Well importing bees affects both hybrid bee breeding and AMM somewhat differently
    Hybrid bees are very by their nature very adaptable to any environment but of course when bees are moved into an area whether they are imported or not they affect the local population
    Fortunately that just alters the genetic mix of the hybrid by adding a bit more of something that was already there
    An Amm breeding program would become a hybrid breeding program as soon as those crosses take place
    Most of the AMM breeding seems to just be breeding hybridised bees anyway

    The questions I might ask are

    When I check my bees they are hybrid mongrels
    Yet the same results elsewhere are near native
    What would you say the cut off point is ?

    How local is local that's another puzzle to me
    when it's hybrids then the next county is no longer local
    AMM local is clear across the country

    How about native
    100 years after importation the non AMM are still imports
    a couple of years after importing AMM are native

    Which brings us to when was day zero when the whole country was populated by AMM bees
    was it before or after the Romans arrived

    There are a lot of inconsistencies
    Last edited by The Drone Ranger; 25-10-2013 at 11:17 PM. Reason: missing letter

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •