Given you've quoted him elsewhere Randy Oliver also concurs that the Harvard Study used up to 400x:
Still on the front page Here as part of his entire critique of the study.Since when has 400 ppb ever been been considered to be “environmentally relevant”? Levels of 1-4 ppb are environmentally relevant; levels above 40 ppb are usually considered to be overtly toxic. So the 400 ppb figure is 100 – 400 times as strong as the normal measured levels in the field due to seed treatment.
No scientific understanding required, more basic reading comprehension and cross referencing of supplied data. Not too late for that either.
Bookmarks