Results 1 to 10 of 42

Thread: A Discussion on Foulbrood

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Lindau Germany
    Posts
    705
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mbc View Post
    Colonies with AFB frequently get up to swarming strength and swarm if they go undetected, the 'dont feed a swarm for a couple of days' tip is a percentages thing, we may as well make it less likely that anything is passed from one generation to the next ( vertical transmission).
    If you gather a swarm that is of unknown origin you have two choices to try and protect yourself from them bringing (possibly large levels of) FB spores with them.
    1. Burn a sulphur strip in the swarm box after collection (with the bees still in it)
    2. Starve them a bit

    choice one is 100% sure to protect you
    choice two is a percentages thing

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Wales, Gorllewin Cymru
    Posts
    709

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Calum View Post
    If you gather a swarm that is of unknown origin you have two choices to try and protect yourself from them bringing (possibly large levels of) FB spores with them.
    1. Burn a sulphur strip in the swarm box after collection (with the bees still in it)
    2. Starve them a bit

    choice one is 100% sure to protect you
    choice two is a percentages thing
    Lol, yes.

    This linky:http://pub.epsilon.slu.se/1053/1/Avhandling.pdf is a paper I keep going back to to explode some myths about AFB, our own NBU seems scared to tread on this ground in case beekeepers twig their colonies need not necessarily be destroyed if they have AFB and they can rid themselves (sometimes !) of the infection given a fresh start on clean comb.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Belfast, N. Ireland
    Posts
    5,122
    Blog Entries
    94

    Default

    Great find that paper, MBC. First time I have seen it.
    It certainly backs up what Calum suggested about not feeding a newly housed swarm.

    Page 18
    None of the swarms showed any clinical disease symptoms at any time. This indicates that the amount of spores
    needed to produce clinical disease are not transmitted by swarms, or at least that they are not readily available to the larvae. If clinical symptoms appear, it is on a non-detectable level. It seems reasonable that a “no brood, no food” argument is
    valid here, as well as in the artificial swarm case. Because the bees do not have
    any stored food they will consume whatever contaminated honey they have in their
    honey sac. Also, there are no larvae available to the swarm to which they can
    transmit spores before most contaminated food carried from the mother colony is
    consumed.
    It also shows that there are AFB spores in a colony without symptoms necessarily being present.
    Page 14

    Twenty-two percent of the individual colonies
    were clinically diseased. All samples from clinically diseased colonies were
    positive. Of the remaining colonies, 77% were positive although they had no
    visible symptoms of AFB. We found a significant relationship between the number
    of clinically diseased cells in the colony and the number of colony-forming units
    (cfu) in the laboratory cultures. Colony-forming units are the number of bacterial
    colonies that grow on the agar plates.
    Fifty-four percent of the apiaries contained clinically diseased colonies. In the
    lab cultures, however, 70 % of the clinically healthy apiaries were positive for
    AFB.
    Last edited by Jon; 11-05-2012 at 09:53 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •