Folks, if we go back to my original post (probably should have started a new thread)
Trog you make my point exactly, as Dews and Milner quote in Breeding better Bees:using simple modern methods
Ruttner (1988) says: "Experience over many years has shown that lasting results can only be obtained from breeding with a pure race, certainly not from breeding with repeatedly crossed (mongrel) local bees."
The BIBBA 'Bee Improvement' Summer 2011 Number 36 reinforces this point of view in discusing core aims and objectives.
But that appears to be a fact of life in current beekeeping circles, and I have nothing but respect for those 'grandees of the craft' (cue images of strange men in aprons and gauntlet gloves) who have maintained bee stocks over many years in the face of considerable environmental and disease factors. I'm in the same boat as everyone else in terms of increasing/maintaining stock - I'll breed from what I have, and what I can get my hands on locally (unless I travel and there's another debate).
That being said, unless there is a co-ordinated approach to the subject we will go round in circles. Perhaps the next time we have debate the merits of Amm we should include the role of national/local organisations more closely?
Bookmarks