Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 910111213 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 128

Thread: Is concern over residues in foundation warranted?

  1. #101
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default

    Yeah, quite right, the lack of dead and dying bees should be a (live) give-away.

    I wouldn't assume that hydrocarbons means that your hives are absorbing appreciable amounts of diesel and petrol. All it means is that your wax contains ... errr .... wax. The word meaningless applies. This from Wikipedia:

    Wax Content Type Percent hydrocarbons 14% monoesters 35% diesters 14% triesters 3% hydroxy monoesters 4% hydroxy polyesters 8% acid esters 1% acid polyesters 2% free acids 12% free alcohols 1% unidentified 6%

  2. #102
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    1,884
    Blog Entries
    35

    Default

    But... But... I was going to start a campaign to get cars banned off that back of that letter. Having thoroughly mis-interpreted the data I thought it was obligatory.

    So at the moment, from our grand sample of three participants, the only chemical of any relevance that's been detected in the wax samples is Thymol and potentially the rest of the stuff being "detected" form the constituent parts of wax to begin with.

    Some context on the quantities might have been useful. hydrocarbons at around 14% of the sample and esters at around 32% would seem to suggest that it's simply the chemical breakdown of the wax itself.

    To put a more positive spin on what we've seen so far, Thymol's the only chemical showing up in measurable quanitity (at this stage) though some qualification over what levels they're detecting at rather than "Lethal" would be useful.
    Last edited by Neils; 07-04-2012 at 03:52 PM.

  3. #103
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nellie View Post
    But... But... I was going to start a campaign to get cars banned off that back of that letter. Having thoroughly mis-interpreted the data I thought it was obligatory.
    I can put you in touch with a man with links to major UK broadsheets and who knows how to work not just <cntrl> c and <cntrl <v> but also <cntrl> b and <cntrl> i if you like!

  4. #104
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default

    It isn't clear to me why they are doing some sort of preliminary analysis. What folk really want to know is the trace levels and I'm absolutely sure that they will find a wide range of pollutants in the samples. However having spoken to local commercial bee farmers they have to have lab tests done on their honey for a wide range of things and they didn't have detections of imidacloprid (at a sensitivity of 1 ppb if I remember right). In honey, not comb. The reason is that the bees degrade it within hours.

    I'd also guess that there will be fewer detections of agricultural chemicals compared with the US commercial beekeeper samples analysed by Maryann Frazier. Partly because the US commercial beekeepers keep their bees on more agricultural land than we do, and partly because I don't believe that UK amateurs in general have the same history of over-medicating their bees with beekeeping chemicals as some of the key players in the States seem to have done.

  5. #105
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    1,884
    Blog Entries
    35

    Default

    I think if the preliminary results were accompanied with some better context it might be more useful than at present. I'm still expecting Fluvalinate etc to make an appearence. I suspect you're right when it comes to general prohylactic medication that we won't see similar results to the US studies which was why I was particularly interested in taking part in this one, especially given the title of this very thread.

    I think the general reaction to the techniques of Hackenburg et al when the documentaries first came out possibly speaks volumes. At least across the hobbyist forums the reactions were pretty uniform.

  6. #106
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    1,884
    Blog Entries
    35

    Default

    Just perusing Thorne's site and notice they're now doing organic foundation but only in National size.

  7. #107
    Senior Member chris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    provence france
    Posts
    409
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Might be interesting to know where they source it.

  8. #108
    Senior Member prakel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Jurassic Coast.
    Posts
    1,480

    Default

    Where do they source it? I don't know.

    Off topic again...

    I do know that the small cell foundation which they used to sell was made to order for them by an American company -can't remember which one with enough certainty to mention the name. It was the tightening of restrictions on wax import which stopped them bringing in small cell from the US, at least, that's the way they explained it to me.

  9. #109
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Wales, Gorllewin Cymru
    Posts
    709

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chris View Post
    Might be interesting to know where they source it.
    I have a friend who imports tonnes of organic beeswax from Zambia, google tropical forest honey for more info, an inspiring operation.

  10. #110
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Scottish Borders
    Posts
    439

    Default

    Given the minuscule risk of contaminants in wax compared to the serious risk of having combs as per the pics on this thread I have made my mind up.

    PH

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •