Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Inbreeding/Diploid Drone risk

  1. #1
    Senior Member Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Belfast, N. Ireland
    Posts
    5,122
    Blog Entries
    94

    Default Inbreeding/Diploid Drone risk

    Big Man or Jimbo or any other closet geneticist:
    I have a queen which had been laying for a week.
    She is a daughter queen of colony 31 in the DrawWing thread.
    She was mated in an Apidea at an Apiary with Galtee Drones and is now back home in a 5 frame nuc.
    There are 12 colonies in the other apiary and I think almost all of them are headed by daughters from the same Galtee queen.
    I grafted some larvae from my new laying queen.
    What are the implications for mating any queens hatched, assuming there are not too many drones coming into either apiary from outside?
    My apiary would be more diverse than the other one but, any new queen would still meet a lot of related drones. I was encouraging Colony 31 to make as many drones as possible.
    Is there an advantage of using one Apiary over the other or are the inbreeding risks the same in each case? Or is the risk nothing to worry about.
    I imagine this is back to genetic diversity in the drones and csd locus.

  2. #2
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default

    Did somebody call?!

    OK, the csd (complementary sex determination) locus. For those who don't know, if you have two different copies of this gene, you're female (if you are a honeybee). If you have only one version, your egg wasn't fertilised and you're male. If you have two identical copies then you'd develop as a male but the patrolling workers usually eat you before you get far.

    First of all, any theoretical assessment is likely to be wrong in practice. Queens and drones will mate with whoever they like (rascals) (unless you force the issue), so nothing is guaranteed. However ....

    I'd worry more about in-apiary mating of colony 31 daughters with colony 31 sons. What would they represent - half of the available drone force in your apiary? Those matings would give perhaps 50% diploid drone eggs, and so if half of the semen comes from them then you might expect 25% dd eggs. Not good.

    Is Mervyn's apiary much better? Maybe. If he had one queen mated with well-mixed drones, then raised quite a few queens from that queen, he would have captured the diversity at the csd locus represented in her spermatheca. He would still be much better with other Amm blood though - ask him about it!

    But the best option is for you to find another source of decent Amm soon, and add that to your breeding stock (or take your virgins there).

    Inbreeding probably affects vigour in other ways too, so too heavy a selection (especially when the apiary is isolated) may be good for the things you are selecting, but bad for overall vigour.

    The advantage of *this* forum is that there is at least one other card-carrying Amm-sympathetic geneticist here too (get Margie taking part and we'll have three) ... so the second opinion ought to be along soon!

    Gavin

  3. #3
    Senior Member Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Belfast, N. Ireland
    Posts
    5,122
    Blog Entries
    94

    Default

    I think Mervyn buys in a new queen each year which is the one he grafts from. The drones in the Apiary are produced by a dozen colonies which are headed by daughters of the previous years Galtee queen. He has just lost this years breeder queen so intends to graft from a couple of my colonies. He faces the same problem in that he has a 2 year old Galtee queen but all the drones in his Apiary are related to it. I should probably graft from his queen and raise the cells in my own apiary for mating.

    PS Who's Margie? The more the merrier.

  4. #4
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default

    Mervyn has it all sorted, as you might expect.

    It seems that Mervyn's apiary has purer Amm than yours. However if your drones are dominated by your more Amm-like colonies, then grafting his queens and mating them at your apiary has its attractions too. For one thing you may have some real Ulster genetics there, whereas Mervyn has gone over to pure Galtee blood.

    Do you know the origin of the Galtee stocks and how broad they are genetically?

    One day you might have Amm queens to spare for enthusiasts in Middle England who seems to be unable to source them locally.

    Margie shares my surname, thanks to husband Jock to whom, as far as I know, I am not related. She was at SCRI for a while and now lives in an enchanted place in Wester Ross.

    G.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Rosneath Peninsula Helensburgh
    Posts
    691

    Default

    Hi Jon,

    Gavin has given the answer and explained it better than I could. He being a practicing Geneticist and me being more a desk jockey Biologist.
    In -apairy mating is a worry if you are trying to improve the strain. When I started I had 5 good Amm colonies and bred other more unrelated hybridised queens with them to improve the Amm charateristics and to have a better mix of drones. This year I have mixed and matched again. I have 3 sites so can isolated the not so good colonies and take queens for mating to the site that has the best Morph results.
    I do have a few concerns. The first is at present I am selecting just on the wing results i.e by using the best wing values I could just be improving this characteristic Gavin might be able to explain better. The second is sourcing good Amm queens to improve my stock. So far I have not seen any inbreeding signs but with so few colonies and some now related I think is only a matter of time. I have arranged to get a queen from Andrew Abraham for next year to improve my stock. I think there is opertunities through the forum to exchange queens, however there are few people trying to improve the Amm and the added complication is some of them do not have varroa therefore we can't freely move queens about.
    Gavin might also be able to explain this but Andrew on Colonsay I think has about 35 colonies which are all Amm and have been in isolation for a number of years. Why does he not get in-breeding or is it a matter of time with such small numbers.

    Jimbo

  6. #6
    Senior Member Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Belfast, N. Ireland
    Posts
    5,122
    Blog Entries
    94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gavin View Post
    For one thing you may have some real Ulster genetics there, whereas Mervyn has gone over to pure Galtee blood.

    G.
    I have some nice colonies and there is no way I want to ditch what I have to start again with Galtee or anything else. I do like the idea of getting some Galtee into the mix though. Mervyn has lovely bees which he works bare handed.

    Quote Originally Posted by gavin View Post
    Do you know the origin of the Galtee stocks and how broad they are genetically?
    G.
    I will be able to corner a few people in a bar in Cahir with questions like that in September.

  7. #7
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default

    Hi Jim and All

    Inbreeding as an issue has been much exaggerated in some quarters. Sure, if you have a really small number of colonies at an isolated site then you may have problems. However 35 colonies is a big number and the diversity stored in that number could be huge if the founding colonies were also diverse. Just one colony (queen and the sperm she carries) could have most of the diversity present in the area - but take one queen to one daughter and repeat, and you will have serious inbreeding issues.

    Queen-swapping could be one of the big benefits of a forum like this.

    Jim, in your situation - where you would expect some fairly pure Amm to turn up - I'd rely on wing morphometry as a first means of selection. It is straightforward, and relies on several genes. To do the job properly you might like to follow Peter Edwards' stud book criteria where a range of Amm traits are used. He has done marvellous things with Amm in Warwickshire.

    G.

  8. #8
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon View Post
    I have some nice colonies and there is no way I want to ditch what I have to start again with Galtee or anything else.
    Do your bees look any different to Mervyn's? Same colour for example?

  9. #9
    Senior Member Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Belfast, N. Ireland
    Posts
    5,122
    Blog Entries
    94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gavin View Post
    Jim, in your situation - where you would expect some fairly pure Amm to turn up - I'd rely on wing morphometry as a first means of selection
    G.
    Are you very confident about the reliability of the morphometry - especially as a first means of selection?
    With someone like me who has used morphometry for the first time this year, it may well give an accurate snaphot of the amm genetics in my apiary,but how accurate would it be for someone who has been using the tool for years? The risk is that you select for vein patterns rather than underlying amm genetics. The assumption is that genes which control vein patterns lie close to genes which control other amm traits so selecting for one automatically selects for the other.

    I can 100% see its use in identifying a hybridised colony and electing not to rear queens or drones from it.

    Quote Originally Posted by gavin View Post
    Do your bees look any different to Mervyn's? Same colour for example?
    They look the same. I wouldn't like to have to separate mine from his in an identity parade.
    Last edited by Jon; 06-07-2010 at 10:42 PM.

  10. #10
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default

    I suppose that Peter Edwards was the one who convinced me that morphometry was a good way forward. Not that he set out to, just that he answered a question in the right way.

    Morphometry seems to sample a range of genes. There also ought to be genes that are responsible for the white cappings, the low temperature foraging, pollen all round the brood nest, thick-set bodies, long hairs on the tergite, body colour. So I asked Peter whether by selecting for wing morphometry (in a heavily mixed area) and some Amm traits he saw the other traits coming along too. He did. This implies that he was fishing out largely unhybridised stocks rather than just breeding for morphometry in a wholely mixed population. I think. DNA tests might not add a great deal to that as they also usually sample a very limited number of genes - unless you are comparing the data to archived samples perhaps.

    If there are little bits of other races lurking in what otherwise seems to be pure Amm stocks selected out of the mix that most of us see, does it matter? Is it any different from what we see naturally? Before man interefered surely there was already hybridisation taking place between races in adjacent regions. So were Amm and its mates not always a little bit mixed? But maintained as different through natural selection?

    I think that I read today - in a paper Jim pointed me towards - that the Colonsay Amms are browner than some others from W Europe. If yours look like Mervyn's then maybe they are both from the same stock.

    G.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •