Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: IR imaging

  1. #1
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default IR imaging

    Here's another thread for a 'Technology' section when I finally get around to a forum rearrangement discussed behind the scenes before Christmas. I'm rather busy at the moment.

    An article in Bee Culture by Jerry Bromenshenk on using IR to assess colonies.

    http://www.beeculture.com/infrared-t...ny-management/



  2. #2

    Default

    Remember the kids song

    "Row,row,row,your boat gently down the stream ...."

    That's the backdrop as a read, read, read, my way gently through the page

    Then the price got a mention

    "If you see a crocodile don't forget to scream"

    "AggggggHhhhh!!! how much" ?

    Good article though

  3. #3
    Senior Member fatshark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ardnamurchan & Fife
    Posts
    1,693

    Default

    You can either add an IR filter or modify a digital SLR to take IR photos (by taking _out_ the filter that usually cuts out IR). The former is easier and much cheaper (about £30 for a filter) but I've no idea whether it's sensitive enough to get the sort of information shown in the pic posted by Gavin.

    There think there was a comment on the BKF recently about using a handheld IR thermometer pointed at the crownboard to determine whether the queen was laying (or the colony was brooding, can't remember which) during winter inspections. I seem to remember that 16oC was mentioned but can't remember where I saw it (probably on a "should I treat with OA now thread").

  4. #4
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fatshark View Post
    There think there was a comment on the BKF recently about using a handheld IR thermometer pointed at the crownboard to determine whether the queen was laying (or the colony was brooding, can't remember which) during winter inspections.
    On the what?!!



    http://www.sbai.org.uk/sbai_forum/sh...ll=1#post33685

  5. #5
    Senior Member fatshark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ardnamurchan & Fife
    Posts
    1,693

    Default

    6a00d8341c4fe353ef0120a50d529c970b-800wi.jpg

    Humble apologies ...

    That explains why any amount of searching failed to find the post I was referring to.

    My brain is waterlogged, like my apiary ...

    anomacts.jpg

  6. #6
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default



    And now the rain is back on .... all my apiaries are out of traditional flooding areas but one has a lot of standing water around the hives and another can't be reached when a burn is in spate, as it has been for a while now. Had to feel for the sheep farmer on the radio yesterday describing watching his sheep getting washed away one by one.

    Anyway, IR. I'd be surprised if filters were enough to get anything like the images shown but the technology (IR cameras) have come down a lot in price and will probably continue to do so.

  7. #7

    Default

    Opportunity to show Amm are better swimmers

  8. #8
    Senior Member fatshark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ardnamurchan & Fife
    Posts
    1,693

    Default

    Here's something to keep you entertained whilst we all evolve webbed feet ...

    I've been reading some stuff from Gene Robinson (Uni. Illinois) about tagging and counting bee activity. The paper's unfortunately not 'free to air' but the relevant bit is here, directly culled from Tenczar et al., Automated monitoring reveals extreme interindividual variation and plasticity in honeybee foraging activity levels. Animal Behaviour 95:41-48.

    ========

    Methods
    Monitoring Technology


    Bees were tagged with laser light-activated ‘p-chip’ microtransponders (tags) (PharmaSeq, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A.). The tags were detected by laser readers (PharmaSeq) connected via a USB cable to a computer. Each tag carried a unique identification number; the tag's upper surface contains photocells that, when lit by a reader's red laser beam, activate the chip to transmit its ID for a distance of up to 10 mm to a pickup coil in the head of the reader. Processing and decoding of the ID were performed with firmware and p-Chip Reader software provided by PharmaSeq.

    Because of the small 1.5 mm diameter of the laser beam, two tags were attached to a bee to increase the likelihood of detection (Fig. 1). Each tag was 500 × 500 × 100 μm with a weight of 90 μg; two tags fit easily on the thorax of the bee, and their combined weight was only 0.56% of the average load carried by a nectar forager (Winston, 1987). This means that it is unlikely that the presence of the tags impaired natural foraging behaviour.

    Figure 1 Typical positioning of two PharmaSeq p-chip microtransponders on the thorax of an adult worker honeybee.

    1-s2.0-S0003347214002589-gr1.jpg

    To read tagged bees, a 10 × 10 mm plastic tube walkway was attached to the hive entrance, with two laser readers projecting into the top of the tube (Fig. 2). Bees passed sequentially under each reader as they entered and exited the hive, so that the order of detection by each reader could be used to infer the direction of travel. The top and sides of the walkway were coated with Fluon (Bioquip Products, Rancho Dominguez, CA, U.S.A.) while the floor of the walkway had numerous small drilled holes to provide grip; this encouraged most bees to walk on the floor of the walkway, maximizing the probability that their tags would be detected. Upon detecting a passing bee, the reader passed the detected ID and reader number to an attached PC, where a time stamp was associated.

    Figure 2 Recording apparatus attached to the front of a six-frame nucleus hive. Bees leave the hive through a 90° entrance elbow (E), then pass through a 10 mm square walkway (W) exiting to the outside at the funnel (F). Outer (OR) and inner (IR) readers record bees passing in the walkway underneath. A ventilated Plexiglas cover fits over the apparatus for rain protection.

    1-s2.0-S0003347214002589-gr2.jpg


    Tagging Procedure

    Bees were tagged when they were 6–24 h old. Each bee was anaesthetized on ice and kept on a container of shaved ice covered with aluminium foil. A vacuum pickup tool (Hakko Model 394 with 0.26 nozzle, Osaka, Japan) was used to select and manipulate upright two tags into a small dish. The tags' serial numbers were read and recorded. A small dollop of Loctite Super Glue Gel Control (Henkel, Düsseldorf, Germany) was applied to the bee's thorax. Tags were picked up with the vacuum tool, a slightly wet toothpick, or a pair of microdissection forceps and positioned on the bee's thorax. The bee was then placed in a cradle to stay upright for the minute or so required for glue drying and recovery. The entire tagging process for a single bee lasted 3–5 min.

    ========

    Some interesting procedures there for making sure the bees followed a particular path in and out of the hive (a nuc). They were tagging 100-500 bees at a time. There's lots of additional interesting stuff in the paper on inferring detection rates, direction of travel etc. Detection rates were surprisingly low 30-50% if they limited them to bees going past the inner then outer (40 seconds or more) outer then inner detector, but were higher if they didn't require every detector to register for every trip.

    I can't post the paper but do have a copy if I need to refer to it again.

    How long do you think you could run a couple of those lasers from a 3.7V battery??

  9. #9

    Default

    You know what Fatshark ,
    It does show the difficulty involved in trying to automate bee tracking / counting
    Temperature and humidity etc are a breeze but not queen tracking it would seem

    Now I've seen your DIY and smart ideas on your website, so there's a challenge for you
    How could you record a queen leaving a mating nuc and returning
    Without making her a target for predators

  10. #10
    Senior Member Greengage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    588
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Ah so It is Fatshark who shows up in my inbox, I follow his/her blog didnt know it was you who wrote "I hate those meeces to pieces"

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •