Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 114

Thread: Rebecca and Ged Marshall on the beeb

  1. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gavin View Post
    No, I said presumably that is the career path. Perhaps I should have said the ideal career path, and I didn't specify whether or not they may get experience elsewhere first.



    According to the information on the BFA website, which you appear not to have read, the host *pays* the apprentice.
    Now look up grants for training providers and employers of apprentices. I did read it and more.
    My point exactly, there is no mention of what happens after they qualify, but since wages would be low and self employment extremely difficult for all the reasons mentioned.
    Perhaps they'll all be recruited as bee inspectors, the thing is nobody seems to know.
    Last edited by SDM; 03-08-2015 at 11:49 AM.

  2. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Drone Ranger View Post
    Morrisons Supermarket ran one of the biggest apprenticeship schemes just lately
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17584151
    Someone working on their fish counter would suddenly become an apprentice and Morrisons would benefit
    So SBC has a point (if that's what is happening in this case)
    That's exactly the sort of thing that happens. The grant system covers 75% of wage and training. Which leaves the employed paying just 25% of the(what, £100/wk) cost. Of course they can add to it and I'm sure he did in his daughters case.

  3. #33
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SDM View Post
    Now look up grants for training providers and employers of apprentices. I did read it and more.
    My point exactly, there is no mention of what happens after they qualify, but since wages would be low and self employment extremely difficult for all the reasons mentioned.
    Perhaps they'll all be recruited as bee inspectors, the thing is nobody seems to know.
    Do you mean grants in general - anywhere on the WWW - or do you mean at the BFA site? All I see on the BFA site is this, which is far from the impression your post gives:

    Finance

    Apprentices are paid directly by their employer (host trainer). While the Bee Farmers’ Association asks employers to pay a base rate which values the apprentice’s contribution to the business, employers may, and often do, pay above this rate. The training element of the scheme is financed by commercial sponsors Rowse Honey. Other sponsors provide practical benefits – for example BJ Sherriff have provided bee suits. Apprentices are provided with a rail travel card free of charge for the duration of their programme.

    No, wait a minute, you do mean the Marshalls:

    Quote Originally Posted by SDM View Post
    That's exactly the sort of thing that happens. The grant system covers 75% of wage and training. Which leaves the employed paying just 25% of the(what, £100/wk) cost. Of course they can add to it and I'm sure he did in his daughters case.
    So you don't know them, never met them, yet you are assuming and implying that they are somehow sponging off government hand-outs (apparently on offer to folk entering family businesses?) ?

  4. #34

    Default

    And you assume theyre not. What we do know is the girl was an experienced queen breeder for one of the most respected importers and as such needed no training after a lifetime on the job. We also know she is not new blood to the industry which is the aim of the scheme. Surely that is exactly what I called it, "questionable".
    I did say" Govt. Grants "
    Try this
    https://www.gov.uk/government/collec...o-24-year-olds
    Last edited by SDM; 03-08-2015 at 02:45 PM.

  5. #35

    Default

    SDM you seem to have a few bees your beekeeping bonnet
    Relax take a step back
    You will get more from the forum that way
    IMHO as they say on the beekeeping forum
    Have you checked them out ?
    They like a bit of argy bargy

  6. #36

  7. #37

    Default

    Thanks for that but after the 2nd time they wrote" their are no wild bees left" I had to walk away and come back to read it again.
    While looking for an out apiary recently, I was attacked by an old woman convinced I was a burglar because of my ridiculous excuse of keeping bees, since all the bees are dead. I returned later with 3 in a jar and left them and a note for her.
    I personally know of 4 feral colonies less than a mile from my home one of them at least a decade old. Sure every feral swarm I took this year had massive Varroa burdens, but reports of their demise are rather exaggerated. I'd complain about it if it hadn't been part of changing peoples attitudes to having hives on their property. A question that a few years ago got a blank look and a straight "No!" nowgets a much more considerate reply.
    The girl in the article , I feel is a much better example of what I thought the scheme was for.

  8. #38

    Default

    Feral an unmanaged honey bees might have been a reservoir of AFB EFB etc
    Having less of them might be a good thing (like having less feral cats)

  9. #39

    Default

    The thing that caught my attention was when she said shortly bees in the UK will rely only on bee farmers for their survival (or words to that effect).
    I seem remember reading somewhere that 70% of the colonies in the UK are owned by amateurs.
    Not much confidence in us then in the BFA world.
    Last edited by Black Comb; 04-08-2015 at 12:12 PM.

  10. #40

    Default

    No offence intended to anyone here(.myself included) but I'd really rather not see the future of another species in our(human) hands.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •