Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Mixing or races/species

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    639

    Default Mixing or races/species

    I recently heard a fascinating account of the genetic make-up of Europeans which, I think, might be pertinent to bee breeding. I know I am thin ice here but I would be grateful if the geneticists amongst us would try to follow my logic and comment.

    According to this programme Homo sapiens were closely enough related to Neandethals to interbreed. I always thought that the ability to interbreed and produce fertile offspring was an indication that the two individuals were of the same species. A horse and a donkey can interbreed and so can a lion and a tiger but in both cases the offspring are infertile. However, according to the radio programme this principle is not clear-cut and there can be degrees of fertility in the offspring which indicates the closeness of the 2 species of parents. Apparently those of us with certain Neanderthal genes are less fertile than pure Homo sapiens. These days we have up to 6% Neanderthal in us but this was formerly much higher. Over the generations those with the most Neanderthal have been less successful (fertile) than others and so the Neanderthal genes in the population is slowly declining.

    Now we come to bees. I recently read a report on a study of pure carniolans and pure Amm bees in Poland. They allowed virgins of each race to fly in areas where the drones were pure but mixed. When they studied the genetic make-up of the next generation they found that the carniolan queens were laying mixed-race eggs but the Amms were laying pure Amm eggs. Hence they concluded that the bees were somehow being selective. This has been witnessed here, admittedly not in scientific studies, and all sorts of isolation mechanisms have been dreamed up for this such as apiary vicinity mating, cold weather mating etc. If my memory serves me correctly I think the Polish researchers guessed that it could be a mechanical thing such as genetalia sizes. I will not enlarge on that but it seems size does matter and smaller is sometimes better.

    Additionally there seems to be a lot of talk about reasons why much of the sperm found in spermatheca is dead these days and people are guessing it's to do with varroacides.

    Could it be due to the fact that queens of certain races are unable to support the sperm of foreign drones once deposited in their spermatheca? Perhaps carniolan queens can keep the sperm of Amm alive but Amm queens can't keep carniolan sperm alive. All this could be due to the fact that the two races are almost different species. They have probably been separated for millions of years, perhaps far longer than the separation of Homo sapiens and Neanderthals (whatever species Neanderthals are).

    It means that in a mixed population some races are more successful than others because so much of the sperm in their spermatheca is alive. Other race queens are quickly superseded because they start with fewer viable sperm due to the fact that many of them are dead or useless but occupying valuable space. If this lot is true all sorts of breeding strategies can be worked out from it.

    Is this another of my mad ideas or has it got legs? Are the PC police on their way?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Wales, Gorllewin Cymru
    Posts
    709

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rosie View Post
    I recently heard a fascinating account of the genetic make-up of Europeans which, I think, might be pertinent to bee breeding. I know I am thin ice here but I would be grateful if the geneticists amongst us would try to follow my logic and comment.

    According to this programme Homo sapiens were closely enough related to Neandethals to interbreed. I always thought that the ability to interbreed and produce fertile offspring was an indication that the two individuals were of the same species. A horse and a donkey can interbreed and so can a lion and a tiger but in both cases the offspring are infertile. However, according to the radio programme this principle is not clear-cut and there can be degrees of fertility in the offspring which indicates the closeness of the 2 species of parents. Apparently those of us with certain Neanderthal genes are less fertile than pure Homo sapiens. These days we have up to 6% Neanderthal in us but this was formerly much higher. Over the generations those with the most Neanderthal have been less successful (fertile) than others and so the Neanderthal genes in the population is slowly declining.

    Now we come to bees. I recently read a report on a study of pure carniolans and pure Amm bees in Poland. They allowed virgins of each race to fly in areas where the drones were pure but mixed. When they studied the genetic make-up of the next generation they found that the carniolan queens were laying mixed-race eggs but the Amms were laying pure Amm eggs. Hence they concluded that the bees were somehow being selective. This has been witnessed here, admittedly not in scientific studies, and all sorts of isolation mechanisms have been dreamed up for this such as apiary vicinity mating, cold weather mating etc. If my memory serves me correctly I think the Polish researchers guessed that it could be a mechanical thing such as genetalia sizes. I will not enlarge on that but it seems size does matter and smaller is sometimes better.

    Additionally there seems to be a lot of talk about reasons why much of the sperm found in spermatheca is dead these days and people are guessing it's to do with varroacides.

    Could it be due to the fact that queens of certain races are unable to support the sperm of foreign drones once deposited in their spermatheca? Perhaps carniolan queens can keep the sperm of Amm alive but Amm queens can't keep carniolan sperm alive. All this could be due to the fact that the two races are almost different species. They have probably been separated for millions of years, perhaps far longer than the separation of Homo sapiens and Neanderthals (whatever species Neanderthals are).

    It means that in a mixed population some races are more successful than others because so much of the sperm in their spermatheca is alive. Other race queens are quickly superseded because they start with fewer viable sperm due to the fact that many of them are dead or useless but occupying valuable space. If this lot is true all sorts of breeding strategies can be worked out from it.

    Is this another of my mad ideas or has it got legs? Are the PC police on their way?
    Could it be that heavy boned people with low sloping foreheads and low intelligence may find it harder to find willing partners to successfully raise families with ?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    639

    Default

    Thre's no accounting for taste mbc. Perhaps Amms think that swarmiolans are ugly. According to the programme though the problem was fertility rather than attractiveness.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Wales, Gorllewin Cymru
    Posts
    709

    Default

    Ahh ! You've seen the family album then !
    lol.
    Smacks of creationism rather than evolution to me.
    Nice idea with the variable sperm survive-ability in the spermatheteca, but as we can send sperms all over the world with little loss in viability I dont buy it.
    I personally think strains can remain remarkably pure under heavy pressure simply because a proportion of each population will always prefer to mate with like. This fits in with bell curves which elegantly explain most things we see in biological systems.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    639

    Default

    I know fastbuck sperm and pseudo carniolan sperm has been shipped around and it's usually beeen used to inseminate Italians but I know of no instances of inseminating Amms with other races. The whole point is that you can put Amm sperm into a carniolan queen but you can't successfully put carniolan sperm into Amm queens. I can't imagine why anyone woud want to do the latter but if someone is then it will blow my theory out of the water.

  6. #6

    Default

    Rosie. I’m sure I’ve read something about the study you refer to. I’m afraid I didn’t give it much more though as my immediate reasoning was that if it were true then why isn’t this nation dominated by pure AMM and why are isolated mating sites necessary?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    639

    Default

    Hi Beefever. Thanks fo your thoughts on this. The study only covered carniolans and I supect most of the imports to the Uk have been Italians. However, I would turn your question on its head and ask why there is still so much Amm genetics in the UK and Ireland after such massive imports over such a long time.

  8. #8

    Default

    Yes I understand your reasoning on this. Pre-varroa, it could be argued, any swarms that escaped were more likely to survive in our climate if they were AMM type so providing many of their drones at a DCA. But of course this can’t be said now. Another argument in favour of your thinking is that Africanised bees in USA seem to dominate wherever they go but I think this is more to do with the amorous nature of their drones. So it can’t be down to numbers or else they would have been diluted long ago.
    I still keep coming back to the fact that I find it harder and harder to keep an AMM type bee in my hives. So in this narrow view of my own experience, I don't see how it works.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    639

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beefever View Post
    I still keep coming back to the fact that I find it harder and harder to keep an AMM type bee in my hives. So in this narrow view of my own experience, I don't see how it works.
    I must admit I find my own black bees keep turning yellow but then I doubt if my bees aren't absolutely pure to start off with and yellow, of course, is an Italian trait and not carniolan. Even if the theory is right I would not expect it to work 100% but just enough to skew the odds in favour of Amm remaining more pure than statistics alone would predict.

    I still think it's a fascinating concept though that subspecies diverge gradually until they eventually become different species and so does their breeding compatibility. I had always assumed that species could either interbreed or not but on reflection there must degrees of compatibility and it would not be surprising to find that honey bee sub-species fall into this grey area.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rosie View Post
    Hi Beefever. Thanks fo your thoughts on this. The study only covered carniolans and I supect most of the imports to the Uk have been Italians. However, I would turn your question on its head and ask why there is still so much Amm genetics in the UK and Ireland after such massive imports over such a long time.
    Hi Rosie
    It's also the case that large quantities of AMM bees were imported at various times
    French Amm had a bit of a reputation for temper

    Just wanted to add that my own bees have a tendency to become more black
    That must be the local drone population although I catch the odd swarm like last season which were very yellow
    Last edited by The Drone Ranger; 05-02-2014 at 01:24 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •