Keep us informed of any published work in the area, especially if there is an English summary but as Jimbo said, there is always Google translate.
I do think care is needed with regard to morphometry. 1.7 for CI is very strict as people here are allowing up to 2.1
If you select breeder queens based exclusively on the best morphometry it is inevitable that you are going to be selecting to some extent for wing pattern only unless the linkage with underlying AMM DNA is 100% and that is highly unlikely. the genes for wing vein pattern could well be located on a single chromosome.
With my own bees, I discount as breeders any colonies which have any bees with yellow bands and any colonies which have a high percentage of wings points well outside the AMM criteria. Some people here keep Buckfast and there are also a lot of yellow mongrel colonies. As yellow is dominant over black, it is likely to show up in the workers if the virgin queen has encountered any Buckfast or yellow mongrel drones - so I use that as an indicator.
Most of the scattergrams I have posted in the last couple of months, I would consider to be acceptable as a source of breeding material but even more important are factors such as low aggression and low swarming tendency and this has to be judged later on when a colony is near full strength.
Bookmarks