Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Defra: An assessment of key evidence about Neonicotinoids and bees

  1. #1
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default Defra: An assessment of key evidence about Neonicotinoids and bees

    Well, you wait awhile for an interesting report on neonicotinoids, and three come along at the same time. Buses must be like neonic reports. This one should set the conspiracy theorists into melt-down. Defra are showing their hand. I wonder what pose the Scottish Government is going to strike?

    An assessment of key evidence about Neonicotinoids and bees

    March 2013

    Executive summary

    Three recent studies in which bees were dosed with neonicotinoids showed sub-lethal
    effects on bees [1-3]. The results from these studies contrast with a growing body of
    evidence from field studies that has failed to show an effect of neonicotinoids when
    bees are allowed to forage naturally in the presence of crops treated with
    neonicotinoids [4-8]. The evidence suggests the reason for this difference is over-
    dosing of bees in the dosing studies; in all cases there is evidence that the doses of
    neonicotinoids presented to bees under laboratory or semi-field conditions were
    unrealistically high. The dosing studies therefore represented the extreme case in a
    field situation. In the only study in which dose was measured [1] the dose was much
    greater than would have ever been experienced in a field situation.

    A concentration of 1-5 μg/l of neonicotinoid in nectar appears to be the threshold below
    which an effect tends not to be observed [9] and most residue measurements in the
    nectar and pollen of treated crops are normally at or below this level [4,6,7,10,11]. In
    addition, examination of bee foraging shows that they tend not to feed exclusively on
    treated crops [7], thus diluting any effects of neonicotinoids. Consequently, the
    evidence of effects of neonicotinoids on bees come from studies [1-3] in which doses
    were likely to have been at least 2-10 times above this threshold.

    There is a possibility that field studies did not have the statistical power to show effects
    but the accumulated evidence across several independent studies suggests that this is
    unlikely and, any effects that are present are likely to be small and not biologically
    significant. Moreover, oilseed rape (OSR) requires insect pollinators to support its
    productivity [12-18]. The fact that OSR treated with neonicotinoids has been a
    productive crop for over a decade in the UK is itself evidence that pollinator
    populations, including bees, are not being reduced by the presence of neonicotinoids.
    Conclusion: While this assessment cannot exclude rare effects of neonicotinoids on
    bees in the field, it suggests that effects on bees do not occur under normal
    circumstances. This assessment also suggests that laboratory based studies
    demonstrating sub-lethal effects on bees from neonicotinoids did not replicate realistic
    conditions, but extreme scenarios. Consequently, it supports the view that the risk to
    bee populations from neonicotinoids, as they are currently used, is low.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Belfast, N. Ireland
    Posts
    5,122
    Blog Entries
    94

    Default

    Interesting review and to my knowledge the first which has cast serious doubts about the methodology of the Whitehorn et al study.

  3. #3
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default Defra: An assessment of key evidence about Neonicotinoids and bees

    One thing that bothered me in the Defra report is the comment that OSR still yields well so the pollinators must be OK. Seems far too casual to be using for this kind of thing, especially when it is known that bees are not that important for the pollination of rape.

    Sent from my BlackBerry 8520 using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Senior Member Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Belfast, N. Ireland
    Posts
    5,122
    Blog Entries
    94

    Default

    Putting bee colonies on oil seed rape is supposed to increase the yield by up to 15%. reference escapes me for the moment but it is from Australia or NZ

  5. #5
    Administrator gavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,464
    Blog Entries
    41

    Default

    Yes, but it is a weak argument to use that to say that the rape still yields well, so the pollinators must be OK. If it really was pollinator armageddon out there, we'd have spotted it by now. They are responding to the more alarmist calls from conservationists. The more sane and rational ones (me for example!) would say that there are still bumble bees in arable areas, but are the populations and is the species diversity lower than it should be simply because of neonics? You wouldn't deny that by simply saying the rape yields well, so all is fine in the countryside.

    It should be blindingly obvious to all that habitat loss is the big one, and those pressing for a ban on neonics - if neonics are more or less harmless in the way they are being used - are doing nature conservation a disservice. A disservice because they are taking the focus away from the real issues, and in the long run the loss of farm pesticides may cause more land to be used for food production than is necessary. That is why it is wrong, wrong, wrong to press for extreme action unless you are sure it is right.

    There's me having a pop at Defra, SWT, Buglife, Soil Association, Friends of the Earth and the more excitable wing of the SBA all in one forum post.

  6. #6

    Default

    the soil dwellers might be the best place to look for probs with Neonics
    Or the nibblers like beetles etc.
    They form the basis of a food chain
    Creatures which munch them might be at risk
    Bees could be affected but they have a short life at the time of year when Rape flowers
    Back at the hive there seems to be no observable effect on brood etc.
    The production tons/hectare rape has gone up considerably so there is room for maneuver
    Last edited by The Drone Ranger; 28-03-2013 at 11:23 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •